Sexual wrong doings and sexual maltreatment of minors within the primary school system is no longer news. Despite our group repulsion, we’re still confounded by its existence and dismayed by our inability to keep our youth safe from the transgressions of those who educate them. After years of professionally designed zero-tolerance plans that have integrated training and monitoring, sexual misconduct continues and a limited number within the school system continue to endanger our children. So what can schools undertake to avoid unacceptable behavior among students and teachers, particularly in today’s internet-savvy culture? Most of the suggestions presented here involve sound judgment, but the absence of reason is generally in the middle of improper student-teacher romances.
First, region administrators have to be vigilant. Pay attention and discuss what you observe and hear throughout the school. There are several sets of eyes and ears available; make use of the existence of teachers, administrators, along with other staff through the entire school to watch and listen. Second, emphasize good behavior by both teachers and students. Many schools today have written codes of conduct for all pupils and regular discussions and seminars on proper behavior for instructors. Ensure that staff and pupils are sticking with the dress code. In some cases, the student or teacher has confessed to dressing to look older or much younger or in a deliberately provocative fashion, as soon as the relationship came to light. This could be an early on danger signal to check.
Another key is observing one-on-one time between a single teacher and a single student. Keep an eye on instructors who look for or spend some time alone with select pupils before or after school, during study halls, or at lunch hours. If a teacher has to meet alone with pupils, the doorway should be open and lights have to be on. While some say that age is a crucial factor in the prosecution of educators who have sexual relationships along with pupils, others may argue that gender may also play a role. It may be interesting to see if Arias is prosecuted and found guilty, and if so, exactly what sentence he gets when compared with a lady instructor charged under the exact same Texas legislation. Ironically, the law was penned so that age and gender are to be ignored; however, those are the problems that are discussed the most by congress, press and prosecutors.
Student-teacher relationships overwhelmingly remain where they need to, inside the classroom. But at times the student-teacher romance turns into something far more, something improper and sexual. Psychologists say instructors who victimize students usually use closeness or fear as a way of commencing an unacceptable relationship. They use their position as an admired role model or being a commanding authority figure.
These psychologists point out that violation of trust make a difference to just how a child views sex and sexual relationships as an adult. Normally, what they discover is that the child comes away believing that it is incorrect, that it has triggered something by undesirable behavior, and that it is fundamentally a second-class citizen or damaged goods. Teachers can have wholesome relationships with their students without it being inappropriate. We have to move past the concept that every young teacher has an ulterior objective or that young women shouldn’t be allowed to teach high schoolers. It’s impractical and paranoid.